Hidden in Plain Sight – The Math Nobody Ran: Velocity, the Capex Reflex, and What Better Is Actually Worth (4 of 5)
The short version: When companies need more output, they often buy capacity they already own. The capex reflex survives because nobody has priced the alternative: increasing the velocity of filling customer demand with the existing footprint. One plant found 70% more capacity in eight weeks with zero spending. One modeled manufacturer nearly doubled its EBITDA on singles.
This is Part 4 of the Hidden in Plain Sight series, and it's the one with the numbers. Parts 2 and 3 explained why the Black Gold stays hidden. This one shows what it's worth when somebody finally runs the math.
Why Does Buying New Equipment Feel Easier Than Finding the Capacity You Already Have?
When a company needs more output, the instinct is almost always to buy something. New equipment, new square footage, a new plant. It feels easier, because it's a concrete path, even when it's the expensive one. Everyone understands the transaction: write the check, install the machine, get the capacity. It may cost millions, but the path is clear.
The alternative is harder to see. Almost nobody has calculated what increasing velocity, the speed of filling customer demand, would actually be worth. The gap between what a plant is producing and what it's capable of delivering stays invisible, because nobody's gone looking for it. So the expensive-but-clear path beats the cheap-but-invisible one, every budget cycle, in company after company.
Part of the confusion is that companies measure efficiency when what actually pays is velocity. Efficiency asks whether every department is busy. Velocity asks how fast all that effort converts into filled customer demand.
It's not about efficiency. It's about velocity.
~ Tim Van Mieghem, from the velocity chapter of Shocking Profit
A building full of busy departments can still ship slow, and busy is exactly what makes it so hard to believe the capacity is there.
Busy is not the same as fast, and fast is where the money is.
What Happens When a Company Is Forced to Look?
Fishy Business is the clearest example I've ever been part of, and the size of what was hiding there still catches people off guard.
They sold frozen, marinated salmon steaks, and in the same quarter, their sales team landed orders from both Sam's Club and Costco. That should have been champagne-popping news, and for about ten minutes, it was. Then reality set in. April, the president, called us.
"We're working 24/7 and shipping record amounts of salmon, on pace to ship $14 million for the year. The bad news is we aren't even close to filling the new orders from the box stores. If we don't get to $20 million, and soon, we stand to lose both those customers."
They looked at their options the way most companies do. Build a new plant: more than a year and millions of dollars they didn't have room for on an already leveraged balance sheet. Outsource: cut their already-thin margins and risk quality control on a product literally called Fishy Business. If they'd had the time and the capital, I have no doubt they'd have broken ground on a new facility. They had neither, and that's exactly what forced them to look at what they already owned instead of what they could buy.
The founder's nephew met us at the door on day one.
"You're not going to find much. This company runs like a well-oiled machine."
By day two, we told April:
"Give us eight weeks and you'll have your 40 percent. No new equipment, no new people."
Two things were hiding in plain sight. The first was the cutting machine you met in Part 3, running at medium because that's the speed the plant manager had been trained on, capable of 40% more the moment someone tried fast. The second was a spare packaging machine sitting idle against the wall, kept as backup in case the primary machine failed, while the active conveyor line into the freezer ran less than half full. Nobody knew if the freezer could handle double the throughput. So they tested it over a weekend. It could.
In eight weeks, that plant filled 100% of the new demand. The bigger number is the one that still gets me: the plant had 70% more capacity sitting inside it than anyone realized, and they only needed 40% of it to satisfy Sam's and Costco. They put the difference toward their own team, dropping from a seven-day production week back to five. No new equipment. No new people. No overtime. The capacity had been there the entire time, worth millions, and completely invisible until someone was forced to go find it.
Growth doesn't fix operational weakness. Growth is just very good at covering it up, until the day it can't anymore.
And notice what it took to find it. Fishy Business didn't take that deep look out of curiosity. They took it because there was literally no other option fast enough. That's one of only two moments when companies ever truly challenge how they work. The other is when a buyer's operational diligence does the looking for them, pricing the gap between what the company produces and what it was built to produce, usually for the buyer's benefit, not the seller's. The companies that come out ahead are the ones that choose to run that examination themselves, before either moment arrives.
Why Do Small Improvements Produce Huge EBITDA Gains?
Here's the piece of arithmetic that changes how leaders see their own income statement. A company grows the top line 15%. It increases velocity by 10%. It trims material costs by 1%, usually through better scrap control and a little tighter supplier negotiation. None of those numbers would headline an annual report on their own. Stack them together, and they routinely produce a 70 to 80% increase in EBITDA.
The mechanism is simple once you see it. EBITDA is a thin slice sitting under much bigger lines. Small percentages of the big lines, revenue, labor, material, land as large percentages of the small one. And because much of the cost base is fixed or semi-fixed, growth that lands on an improved operation doesn't drag its full weight in new cost along with it. The plant, the supervision, and the back office were already there. That's operating leverage, and it's why modest operational moves punch so far above their weight.
Small percentages of big numbers are big percentages of the small number at the bottom.
What Does It Look Like When You Actually Price the Opportunity?
Even leaders who sense the opportunity usually hold it as a vague feeling instead of a number. Nobody has modeled the optimized target, the number the infrastructure they already own was built to produce. And an unpriced opportunity loses every budget fight to anything with a price tag on it.
Here's what pricing it looks like. We modeled a food manufacturer, figures rounded and the company disguised, that came to us earning $7.3 million of EBITDA at a 15.3% margin. No metrics on the floor. Capacity known by feel, not by calculation. Running well enough that nobody had a reason to look.
The plan wasn't heroic. Three buckets of singles: a few points of price, labor productivity through daily management, and tighter sourcing, scrap, and freight, minus the cost of the added management needed to hold the gains. No home runs anywhere on that list. Those singles alone took EBITDA from $7.3 million to $10.5 million, a 43% increase, before a single dollar of new sales.
Then the growth already sitting in their plan, 15%, landed on a cost base that didn't grow with it. EBITDA finished at $14.1 million, up 93% from where we found them. At a flat seven-times multiple, that's enterprise value moving from $51 million to $99 million.
And for anyone thinking about an eventual sale, there's a second kicker. Middle-market multiples move in bands tied to EBITDA size. A company that grows its earnings from $7 million to $14 million doesn't just earn more. It frequently changes the band it gets priced in, so the same improvement gets paid twice, once in earnings and again in the multiple.
Nobody swung for a fence. A handful of singles nearly doubled the company.
Key Takeaways for PE | Key Takeaways for Owner-Operators |
|
|
FAQ
How much EBITDA is typically hiding in a middle-market company?
More than most leadership teams would guess. In our modeling work, stacking a handful of modest improvements, pricing, labor productivity, sourcing, and scrap, routinely moves EBITDA 40% or more before any new sales, and the gains compound further once growth lands on the improved cost base. Every company is different, and no result is guaranteed, but the pattern shows up in engagement after engagement.
What is the difference between efficiency and velocity?
Efficiency measures whether resources are busy. Velocity measures how fast all that activity converts into filled customer demand. An operation can score high on efficiency, every department humming, and still ship slowly, carry excess inventory, and leave capacity untapped. Velocity is the number the customer and the income statement actually feel.
Why do companies default to buying new equipment?
Because capex is a clear path with a known price, while hidden capacity is invisible until someone measures it. Leaders can picture exactly what a new machine delivers. Almost nobody has modeled what fixing flow in the existing operation would deliver, so the concrete option beats the uncalculated one by default.
What is an optimized target model?
It's a financial model of what a company's existing infrastructure was built to produce, built initiative by initiative, with each improvement priced against the specific line it moves. It converts a vague sense of opportunity into a number that can anchor a budget, a value creation plan, or an investment thesis.
Can operational improvement really change a company's valuation multiple?
It can, in two ways. Higher EBITDA raises value directly at any multiple. And because middle-market multiples tend to move in bands tied to EBITDA size, growing earnings past a band threshold can also raise the multiple applied to every dollar. Improvement bands are market generalities, not a valuation opinion, but the double effect is real and routinely underestimated.
The Next Question
Knowing the size of the prize still leaves the hardest question: how to actually capture it without making things worse. Most companies attack the loudest symptom and call it action. The last article in this series covers what works instead, and the payoff bigger than the profit.
Want to see the 6 Value Levers in action across a real diligence engagement? If you’re a PE operating partner sizing a deal, call us at (312) 726-6111, or grab 20 minutes directly on my calendar at calendly.com/tvm.
Next in the series: Part 5 – Patches, Plans, and the Leadership Payoff.
Comments